Thread:GreenDevil97/@comment-27694954-20200716084902: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 09:04, 16 July 2020

Hi, thanks for editing in the information based on the CGI model. I'm a long time proponent of that being the actual scale. Altho, I must admit, I always got more around 55m meters in length, would you be so kind and share the math with me? I fully admit that my math sucks, so I've probably made some errors. Thanks!

I've also made some calculations, based on the width of the railways: here

I also wonder what could you make about this schematic of Big Alice. I've spoken with Alex and he will release an HD version of this schematic soon.

<ac_metadata title="Snowpiercer's dimensions"> </ac_metadata>

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Hi, thanks for editing in the information based on the CGI model. I'm a long time proponent of that being the actual scale. Altho, I must admit, I always got more around 55m meters in length, would you be so kind and share the math with me? I fully admit that my math sucks, so I've probably made some errors. Thanks!<ac_metadata title="Snowpiercer&#039;s dimensions"> </ac_metadata>
+Hi, thanks for editing in the information based on the CGI model. I'm a long time proponent of that being the actual scale. Altho, I must admit, I always got more around 55m meters in length, would you be so kind and share the math with me? I fully admit that my math sucks, so I've probably made some errors. Thanks!
+I've also made some calculations, based on the width of the railways: [http://img.nepster.cz/SnowpiercerSize.png here]
+I also wonder what could you make about this schematic of Big Alice. I've spoken with Alex and he will release an HD version of this schematic soon.[[File:BigAliceSchematics.png|left]]<ac_metadata title="Snowpiercer&#039;s dimensions"> </ac_metadata>